patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Do You Support Building a New Veterans Home?

Question 4 on the Nov. 6 ballot asks residents whether the state should borrow $94 million tp build a new facility and renovate the existing one.

 


Edward Hanrahan has lived at the Rhode Island Veterans Home for 8 years. He commends the staff for the service and care he receives, both of which he says are outstanding.

What is not is the facility he lives in.

"We're damn glad to be here on the whole; we get excellent care," the World War II veteran and bronze star winner said. "But we do need a new home. It's an old building ... problems with the sewers, problems with the pipes, and so many leaks in the roof. Buildings this old ... very few still standing."

The Veterans Home on Metacom Avenue in Bristol was built in 1954 and was last renovated in 1969, according to state Rep. Ray Gallison, who hosted an event at the home Tuesday to rally support for Question 4 on the Nov. 6 ballot, asking residents to borrow $94 million to build a new veterans home.

"It's starting to get old and worn out, and there have been a lot of Band-aids," Gallison said after the rally. "We need a modern facility. This is for our vets."

The new Veterans Home, which would be built on land behind the existing facility, would house 240 permanent residents, including some spouses who don't currently live at the facility, along with dining and recreation areas. The existing facility would be renovated and used for rehabilitation services, allowing residents to get treatment on campus instead of traveling to the veterans hopsital in Providence.

Not all are in favor of borrowing such a sum while the state economy is still struggling to recover from recession. The Provience Journal, for instance, has come out against the bond referendum, citing the project's cost and its impact on a relatively small number of people.

While the number seems high, Gallison pointed out that there are no other large referenda on the ballot this year — even for road projects which have appeared on many recent ballots before the state moved to a pay-as-you-go system — and that the state will receive federal matching funds if the referendum passes, helping defray the costs. Plus, the project benefits those deserving of help later in life. 

"We have a moral obligation to get this passed," Gallison said. "People in Rhode Island have always supports veterans."

Gov. Chafee acknowledged the recovering economy, but noted that for the first time in 72 months, all five indicators for uemployment are positive. "We can afford to go out and support Number 4," he said.

So what do you think? Should the state go to bond for $94 million for a new Veterans Home or is this the wrong time to borrow such a sum? Do you plan to vote for Question 4? Tell us in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Question 4, Rhode Island Veterans Home, and election 2012

David E. Barboza

9:54 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Putting politics aside, the important focus should be what is best for our veterans. The home is beginning to see some veterans returning from recent wars. It is our moral obligation to provide the best services to these returning heroes as well of those of the past who have served their country and many still carrying the physical and psychological scars of war.
As "Bear401" pointed out a new Veterans Home is badly needed. Let's get the mechanism in place by supporting this project. It is my understanding that under General Baccus many changes have been made. I've visited the home and residents are happy. I know members of the staff and have not heard any complaints. However, if problems do exisit then by all means lets get them addressed. A news conference was held earlier tihs week with top state, federal and local officials endorsing support for Question 4 and the 9 million dollar project.
Let's not lose sight of the object. And "Bear401" please email me at david02809@aol.com if you'd like to discuss this further.
David E. Barboza, vice chairman, Bristol Town Council

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris Christensen

10:35 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Yes, we vets put our lives out there for our country and other countries too. Staying in a Veterans home is not a freebie for either the Veteran or their spouses. I would say that if it is falling down some of the local Veterans Organizations should get involved in checking out the maintenance and running of it. Is there anyone in Rhode Island that doesn't have an older Veteran in their family or even today maybe a much younger Veteran who would be eligible to live in the home. It is time to pay back Rhode Island.

Gina

10:08 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

This article makes one believe that the state will receive matching funds. From what I have read & heard, that is not the case. The total cost of this project will run up to approx $138 million & it's "possible" the state could receive up to $20 million in funds. That's not "matching funds". If anyone could shed more light on this I would appreciate it.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Patrick Luce

11:25 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Hi Gina, the state is line line to receive federal matching funds if voters approve the referendum, though the dollar amount is uncertain. The amount certainly won't "match" the $94 million. "Matching funds" is just the term commonly used for federal money added to such a referendum.

Sanford Gorodetsky

10:18 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Councilor Barboza is right on target. We shall soon experience even greater need for a satisfactory physical facility due to aging Korean and Vietnam war veterans.
Our by-word should be, "If not for Veterans, then for whom?"
Sanford Gorodetsky, Cmdr. RI Dept. JWV of USA

Reply

jim vieira

11:17 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I will support this project 100%. If the State can give Schilling $38 million, then we can help our aging Veterans. We have a moral obligation to. Dave, I've been in the RIVH quite a bit through work, Gen. Baccus has done an outstanding job since being put in that position!

Reply

marina peterson

11:46 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I find it amazing that we feel a building built in 1954 is in need of being replaced. I know we live in a disposable society, but this is taking it to the extreme. I would rather see an all out request for "in-kind" donations of workers and construction companies to volunteer to repair/replace what is broken. It would be a wonderful project and would probably mean more to the veterans to think that people rallied together to work and improve their home.
As far as supporting the veterans, I would also like to see an all-out push for folks to come and visit the veterans on a regular basis. I have a group that visits the veterans on Christmas morning and we bring cookies and spend the morning with them. You cannot imagine how appreciative they are of people that "give up" (I don't feel it is giving up at all) their Christmas morning to be with them. Last year Brendan Doherty joined us and veteran's had tears in their eyes to think that the Commander of the State Troopers came to see them on Christmas morning. And, before it is mentioned... this was NOT A PHOTO OP for him! No-one but us knew he was there.
Yes, let's remember our veterans with compassion, our time, and our compassion!

Reply

Gina

11:48 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Does this building only serve veterans from RI ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike M

11:55 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

The facility actually caters to ALL veterans. You can be born in other states and live at the Veterans home. If a veteran has has an address in RHODE ISLAND for OVER TWO YEARS, they can qualify to reside at the home. The building will not be torn down, but instead rehabbed to accommodate more medical services for these deserving people, so they don't have to be shuttled to Providence as often. The new building will make rooms more comfortable for these veterans, and bigger bathrooms, to accomodate their wheel chairs. This is frequently an issue, as with an older design, hallways, bathrooms, and bedrooms are not ADA acceptable, and they struggle to get around at times. These veterans deserve modern facilities, and the biggest problem will be addressed. These Veterans must sacrifice being with their spouse in order to reside here, and that is very difficult on everyone in the families. This separation is traumatizing to these veterans, and now they will be able to be with their spouse and live together, if people vote YES for Question 4 !!

David E. Barboza

1:05 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Gina, the home servers any veteran from Rhode Island that meets their qualifications.
And to expand on what Patrick stated, The funding would come from the Department of Veterans Affairs. The amount is uncertain, but as Patrick pointed out they will not commit funds unless the project receives voter approval.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gina

1:33 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Thank you David...I didn't know if veterans from other states were cared for here as well. I'm glad I asked...I was assuming wrong ....

no regr allia b

2:05 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Have to agree with Bear401. There are a lot of problem at that home and the least is the building. There have been problems with the work force for years and years as Bear401 has written about for a long time. A new building will not fix that.

I also question the need for a new building. These tear down and build new trend is becoming insane. I understand why big business does it. But the State could I am sure upgrade the existing building for less than half the price. Not to mention the relocating of the Vets well a new one is being built.

Even if they are building it in a different spot on the land, you can be sure you will then see efforts to turn the old building into some non-profit use for the town I suspect. They do this with building’s all the time in this State and then you will see yet another bond to upgrade the old building for the new plan they will have. Using the “It’s for the Vets” like “It’s for the children” as usual to do other nefarious deeds as usual is disgusting.

This has been the model for decades

Reply
Comment_arrow

no regr allia b

2:14 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Oh when I say work force I mean management and the Vets Council who seem to have forgotten their mandate for years now. To Barboza yes politics plays a major role in this as usual it cannot be put aside. Bear401 is right on the money in that also with the cronyism, nepitism and the old use the Vets, people will never question it tactic. Yes I am a vet and see this all to often from our politicians, Federal, State and Local. Just tired of this scamming.

Comment_arrow

Mike M

12:03 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I wonder how much you really know about what happens there. The General has done a great job and most of the Veterans who live there are happy. Years ago situations may have been worse, but they have dramatically improved. The new building would add to the capacity currently allowed by the home, and the oid building would be renovated to offer more medical services. It would be difficult to "renovate" the old building to make bedrooms and bathrooms bigger, as that would cost a significant amount of money and significantly reduce capacity. They want to make the lives of these men better by giving them bedrooms that they will be able to ambulate in with their wheel chairs. Currently they are stowed in hallways when not in use, because they take up so much space in the small rooms. The new building would make these Veterans feel more at home, especially if they can reside with their spouse. I am shocked that you being a Veteran would rather see these guys not have a comfortable place to spend many years of their lives.

Comment_arrow

Mike M

12:04 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

And you also said the Veteran's would be displaced during construction. That is not true, they would remain where they are now until the new building is complete, and then they will move into their new larger rooms.

Comment_arrow

no regr allia b

12:27 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Mike I think you are missing something here. I am not against better living conditions and care at all. I question the money. When you look at the new Central Fire Station up the Street and then see $94 million for this. Any reasonable person would have to ask why. You could build about 20 of those stations which is state of the art. So why is this so high for a new building and renovation?

As for the move, I said if they have to in order to build the new one. The question of the ballot is very vaugue on cost and what is actually being done. I find it hard to believe this will take 10 years to build as the ballot question say the completions date is 2023. It does not sound well thought out at all.

Also any funding from federal sources will be used to reduce borrowed funds. Sorry but there are no funds from federal, we are broke!! I see no reason to not put this off for a few years to get a plan for funding and not a hurry and build for 10 years. There is no dounbt in my mind that a ten year time frame means one thing only. Double or triple the cost and cutting the original plans to the bone. Typical RI samming on the backs of taxpayers and the Vets in the middle yet again.

Granted it is all my opinion, and thats why my vote will not be for this or any question on the ballot this round. I was for this question 4, until i looked at it more and more and the 10 year building time was the nail I could not get an answer as to why. It smells to high heaven for me.

Comment_arrow

no regr allia b

12:39 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I also do not know where anyone is getting this matching funds or federal funds etc. There are none. If there was it would be in the explaination on the ballot as required and as it allways is. This is a total State funded project and we are broke also.

The reason the question say "any Federal Funds" is they have not been offered any, that is an if and or but as they say and doubtful.

Again, I would love to provide everything you posted and do it immeadiatly. However the economic times being what they are cannot sustain this kind of spending that can obviously be delayed and renovate all they can for now. But it is a Presidential election year and that is why it has not been on the ballot until now.

When I see a plan that is clear and easy to understand with a build time a lot less than a decade. Then I will believe it is truely viable. Right now it still looks like a scam anhd headed for a debacle of epic proportions with cost over runs for years and years. Not to mention the political football it will become i'm sure.

Comment_arrow

no regr allia b

12:51 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Mike take a look and read up on this building at Texas A&M. It cost $95 million took 2 years to build, 220,000 square feet and has medical labs and everything else you can think of. It open 2011. This is best explaination for why this seems shady when I see things like this.

http://vpr.tamu.edu/resources/ilsb/about/ILSB_OnePager050412.pdf

Comment_arrow

no regr allia b

12:58 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012

It is not $95 million. The total cost of this project is $138,333,691 dollars with the interest being $44,333,691. Think about that. It is assumming a 4% interest rate over 20 years.

OK I'm done ;-}.

Pat

2:42 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I vote for #4 - The veterans of our state need a new home not keep repairing the existing home. These are people who have served to give us freedom and they should have a nice home to care for them - please vote for #4 - The new home will have assisted living and spouses can also stay together which they cannot do now and sometimes due to age, it poses a problem with family members visiting. VOTE FOR #4

Reply

Bear401

6:51 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

If you want to see a real waste of $$ in Veterans Affairs find out on the QT when a Dept Head Meeting is scheduled. The go in & look through the window of the Conference Room. Not only is Every chair around the table taken but there are people sitting along the walls. A conservative estimate would be around 20 people & probably more. A Lot of people with titles. THAT is what the RIVH & Vets Affairs is All about. The architect of all of that is now on the Veterans Advisory Board/Council to the Governor

Reply

no regr allia b

7:02 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Very Strange Bear401. I do not recall anything in your post that seemed out of place or not factual for that matter. It appears that opinions are slowly being censored around the patch of late.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tivertontaxpayer1

7:56 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

So Jack, seeing you don't support a new modern building for the disabled veterans, what do you suggest we do with them? Force them to sleep in sleeping bags and tents out in the woods so it can remind them of their military days?

Here's an idea Jack-If you're so worried about spending money for the veterans, why don't you set an example and give up your federal pension to help pay for renovations to the old veterans home.

New screen name-same old Jack-chronic complainer.

Bob Venice

7:22 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

For once, lets leave the politics out of this and vote for a new home. Veterans have more then earned the right to live out there lifes in comfort.

Reply

GINNY HANSON

7:48 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

The Home was built in 1891, the last work done on the home was in 1964, renovations. We cannot fix and patch the building anymore. It will not hold.
None of the Residents receive Medicare or Medicaid. Very few Residents qualify for Medicare or Medicaid. If we did go to Medicare or Medicaid (which we can't) the State would receive less money than they receive today. The Staff are excellent in giving care and services to the Residents. They are to be commended for being able to work around the buildings issues and make due with conditions of the building. The State could have up to 65% reimbursement from the government on the $94 million.
You have veterans coming back from the wars minuse legs, arms, burn victims, mental issues, PTSD, The services and technology of today and in the future cannot be installed in this old building to accomondate these tramatic injuries.
I have volunteered with the wounded warriors, I see the equipment, etc they need to live with. We need to lighten the burden and make their life as comfortable as we can because of what they went through in the wars and we are safe in our homes. Say yes to question #4, build the new Veterans Home.
Ginny Hanson, Commander DAV, Lawson-Raiola, Chapter 15, Bristol, RI

Reply
Comment_arrow

marina peterson

12:26 am on Friday, October 26, 2012

Ginny, "The great tradition of Rhode Island serving its Veterans began in 1889 with the formation of the State Board of Soldiers Relief. The first charge given to the Board was to determine the feasibility of constructing a Veterans Home. The first temporary home was established in the fall of that year in Wickford Village, followed by the construction of a permanent home in the Town of Bristol in 1890 and the first resident admitted to the Home in May 1891." The structure that is there today is not the original structure. I'm sure you realize that.

Bear401

9:28 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

You can't keep politics out of anything in this state. I never said a new VH should not be built. But it shouldn't be built if the state is going to just continue with what seems to be a never ending stream of incompent politically connected cronies running Veterans Affairs. Patch can eliminate my comments all it wants but that won't change that fact. It's about time people start being honest about what is going on. As I said in a comment that got eliminated, unless you work or have worked there for any length of time as I have then you none of you have any clue about what really goes on there. On renovations the South Building was added in the late 70's. At one time there were over 400 residents in that facility before that wing was built. I used to see the daily census so I know. Today one entire wing (N-7) is completely vacant. A new HVAV system was installed in the late 90's but for some reason not one vent used for the cool air was near any residents room. They were all down near the nurses station on ALL floors. Not surprised at that. Heck a utility closet with towels, wash cloths, sheets, etc had cool air coming in through a vent. But nothing in the hallways where the residents rooms areThey are still trying to use floor fans to blow cool air down nearly 200' hallways to where the residents rooms are. N-3 wasn't even connected to the HVAC system originally. Is the sprinkler system in the new facilty going to be hooked up to a generator? It isn't in this one.

Reply

marina peterson

12:03 am on Friday, October 26, 2012

What is it about "matching funds" or "federal money" that makes it hard to understand that it is just more of YOUR taxpayer money? There is NO FREE MONEY! Our veterans deserve to be taken care of in a dignified, safe manner. No one is arguing that. If there is more space needed then it should be provided. Every time I am at the home I see more and more vacant rooms and empty space. Can it be rehabilitated? I am confident that there are many contractors out there who would be more than willing to donate time and maybe even materials to such a worthy cause. Why not start there? It's not a matter of not wanting the best for our veterans... it's a reality check.... There is NO money. Something else will have to go. How about the legislative grants? That would be a start.

Reply

marina peterson

12:17 am on Friday, October 26, 2012

Tivertontaxpayer.... That is really uncalled for. We just need to do some reality checks as to how things are going to be paid for. If it is decided to go forward with this project... then something else has to go. It's pretty simple. It could be taking a serious look at the cost of illegal immigration in Rhode Island, for example. That would more than cover it. We just can't have it ALL. Those days are over!

Reply

marina peterson

1:07 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Tivertontaxpayer1 If $94million is a drop in the bucket then it should not require borrowing the money. We should be able to find it in our overall state budget. These are fiscally hard times. WE have to prioritize! I am 100% for putting the Veteran's home at the top of the list... but something else has to go. It should not be hard to find an initiative to cut in order to do this. Think of it as you would your family budget. If you want to purchase something but your budget is strapped already... you find ways to cut things so that you can make the purchase.
I still don't understand why organized labor keeps cropping up. Do you know something I don't about promises made to organized labor involving this project?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Patrick Luce

1:36 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Thank you all for your active participation on this issue. Just a quick reminder to refrain from name-calling and unproven accusations. I've had to delete a couple comments that violated our Terms of Use for those reasons. Otherwise, keep at it. This is definitely a conversation worth having.

Reply

marina peterson

2:22 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

"especially when the Feds kick in"..... That is not free money.... That is our taxpayer money. Why do you not realize that?
Again, I don't even know how the conversation got turned to tradesman, union or otherwise. And I don't know any $5.00 hour chumps. Maybe you are referring to my suggestion that contractors may want to donate time and material to this project? I have a hard time following your train of thought.
I will say it again. If the project is a top priority, (which we all believe it is), then they can eliminate something else in the budget to pay for it. $94Million is a drop in the bucket when you are looking at the waste and duplicity of the budget. It will be easy to find. We just can't afford to borrow it.

Reply

marina peterson

2:28 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

To be absolutely clear..... I am 100% behind the best accommodations we can provide for our veterans. We cannot afford to borrow the money. We need to find another way. And, if there is no other way for some some strange reason, I think we can renovate the home, as we do to old schools for our children, and substantially improve their home.

Reply

Kate

5:32 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

Marina, Let me put some perspective on the issue. As someone who's father lived in the facility for sixteen years I will speak from first hand experience because I was there daily. We need the home for the following reasons: It has outlived it's ability to meet the needs of returning Vets, It is an antiquated facility that lacks the modern technology to be in line with twenty first century medical standards, It was poorly designed with a flat roof and a history of leaks. The expansive distance one must travel in a wheelchair to and from dining and activities is no longer an option. The sloping grade from the So. building to the No. building is not feasible for someone with a physical handicap.The main lobby floor is an irregular surface and causes great physical pain to those with spine and neurological injuries. The units must be equipped with indwelling oxygen units both for safety and ease of access- I could go on and on. Your suggestion that the home could be renovated is way off mark, in fact it would cost more to renovate than to tear down and begin from scratch. NOW is the time to build the home while the interest rates are low, our vets have earned it, and I cannot see a better use of tax dollars than to assure that our veterans are cared for in a top notch facility. Gen. Baccus and his team are doing a great job there with what they have to work with but the fact remains that the band-aid box is just about empty and we MUST get this bond passed on Nov. 6th.

Reply
Comment_arrow

marina peterson

12:06 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

Kate, I agree with you wholeheartedly! That is why we need to INSIST that these funds be found in the budget for this cause. No is NOT an acceptable answer. On the fiscal side, RI cannot afford to borrow any more money. If you only knew how many millions of our dollars are squandered on people who broke the law to come here and live illegally you would be sick! We need to reallocate some of that money to this important initiative! We spend over $400 million a YEAR on illegal immigrants. That is where the money could come from. Reference:
http://www.politifact.com/rhode-island/statements/2011/feb/06/terry-gorman/gorman-says-illegal-immigrants-cost-rhode-island-4/

Kate

3:45 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Marina, spare me the lecture. I am an educated AMERICAN. You can take your unamerican comments someplace else. Do not try to undermine the efforts to get this done, this project can not wait one more day. OUR VETERANS DESERVE NOTHINGLESS.

Reply

Fran Santos

5:26 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Marina Peterson and her fellow East Bay Patriots are at it again trying to use phony information to prove their point. The link she cites is to a ProJo Politifcats that the ProJo found to be UNTRUE and FALSE. Why doesn't she just admit it, anything to help people, in this case our deserving Veterans, she is against.

Reply

Fran Sousa

11:09 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Marina you are incorrect the aricle you refer to is from the Providence Journal and this is what they said about the facts you cite: "The $400 million figure he repeatedly cites sounds authoritative. But three of his four categories are based on numbers that are outdated, grossly inflated or have no documentation. Thus, the inflammatory assertion that illegal immigrants drain the state of $400 million a year -- $400 for every man, woman and child in Rhode Island -- is ridiculously high.
And because inflammatory, ridiculous assertions qualify for our worst rating, we rule Pants On Fire!"

Reply
Comment_arrow

marina peterson

11:22 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I believe that the "pants on fire" statement was retracted at a later date. But even if it is only $300 million, as Palumbo stated... it's still too much to be spending on people who broke the law as opposed to people who fought for our country. This is a no-brainer. Our veterans deserve priority. It is the money we are spending on illegal immigrants that should be a referendum!

Comment_arrow

marina peterson

11:58 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Cost estimate in 2010 of Illegal Immigrants in RI - enough to build 4 1/2 Veteran's homes.
Education - $239,600,000
Incarceration - $7.400,000
Medical Services - $124,950,000
Uncompensated Care - $69,000,000 (approx 1/2 of $138,000,000
Jobs taken - 17.700

Total cost $440,950,000 annually plus 17,700 jobs

MIMI

2:01 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I say build, build, build. No one deserves new state of the art facilities than our vets. To compare them to children and schools is an abomination. Schools are for young mostly agile youngsters who don't need oxygen, talented nurses and care. Rehab for the new young vets without limbs, and Viet Nam and Gulf war vets and Afghan vets is not an option. If Obama can spend 250 billion on 400 jobs (stimulus) we better consider this a top priority.

Reply
Comment_arrow

marina peterson

11:24 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Absolutely! And it IS a priority. One that should not need a referendum to fund! Our General Assembly should be able to find this money in the budget!!!! It should take priority over everything!

Stella Maris

2:21 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

As I read any objections to building this new home I want to be sick. WHEN WILL WE REALIZE THE SACRIFICE these men and women have made for us? I am so sick of our veterans being treated like a burden. I find it heart warming that you visit the home at christmas time MP. But I can assure you that visiting it a few times a year doesn't paint a true picture. I can tell you because I spent most of my adolesence there visiting my dad, over 15 years of my life. So when you speak about this home like you are an authority on it I can assure you, others know much more than you on this matter and the fact that you feel it appropriate to say it needs only renovations is shameful. The building is not only a safety hazard for these vets it isn't condusive to their quality of life, their rehab, or medical or social needs. The building should have been torn down years ago. When our Vets have to wheel themselves around 5 gallon buckets catching rain that has been dripping through the building its not a minor issue nor is the mold and mildew caused by these leaks. I have seen on more than a few occasions men trying to wheel themselves in two seperate area's of this home that have very steep inclines start rolling out of control. The shower area is way to far for wheel chair persons and not private at all. The rooms are too small for hoya lifts and wheel chairs. This home should be rebuilt asap! It is our duty to repay these guys with a state of the art facility. ~ a true patriots daughter.

Reply
Comment_arrow

no regr allia b

9:54 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Stella Maris

The problem is not those looking at this responsibly. No one is saying they do not deserve the best place to live and be cared for. Some of us are questioning the method of how it will be done. It is not in the best interest of the Vets to have a project that will cost $138 million dollars total cost to build and renovate that is not thought out.

The build time is 10 years which sounds insane. In my post above is a link to a State of the Art learning Facility at Texas A&M which is 220,000 square feet. That is the size of 2 ½ football fields. It has various Teaching labs, classrooms and other facilities that boggle the mind. Price was $95 million dollars and it was built in 2 years. Completed in 2011. Why it will take 10 years to build this for me means something shady is going on. It will be the Vets who suffer for it and it will surely go way off budget.

This State has a history failed projects that end up being scam after scam and this sounds like one. A better more detailed plan and funding needs to be put forward is what most posting against this bond issue are saying, to include the ambiguous expense and build time in my opinion. There is a difference between the bond and the Vets needs. The whole picture must be looked at and no-one has explained the design, funding, and time of 10 years to build it yet. That is the Elephant in the room for me anyway.

Comment_arrow

marina peterson

12:39 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Well said Stella! You may have misunderstood my comments on renovation. I am totally supportive of a new home for the veterans. What I find absolutely appalling is that it will only happen with a voter referendum to cover the cost!!! Why does our General Assembly not see this as an absolute priority!!! Let something else go to a referendum! They can certainly find the money in the budget if they try. the renovation that I suggested was meant to be an immediate "bandage" for some of the inadequacies that exist, rather than wait 10 years.

I have said it before, and I will repeat it. Take some of the money that is allocated for illegal immigrants and take care of our VETERANS!

By the way, I do not only visit the home on Christmas...

Rick Giannini

10:06 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Vote yes on # 4 for the following reason:

Our military is all volunteer, these men & woman who live at the facility stood up and volunteered their lives and personal well being for our freedom; a freedom which most of us take for granted.

If they need a new facility to live in, we should all be doing everything in our power to afford them a decent place to live and get the care for their needs. There are parts of the building that the heat and air conditioning are unable to be controlled. Some hallways and rooms are 75 degrees, others are 60. Case in point, last month the elevator had a fire in the mechanical room and was non-functioning for almost a week, residents were unable to access the lower level of the facility to interact with staff, or participate in activities. These little things may not seem like a big deal to you, but when you live in a facility and depend on simple things such as an elevator, it is a major complication in their lives when something like this becomes interrupted.

After all, they weren't asked to help us, but we should be thanking them in an appropriate way for their invaluable service and sacrifice not only to the State, but this great nation.

Please, vote YES on #4.

Reply
Comment_arrow

marina peterson

11:50 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Yes Rick, they do deserve a modern up-to-date facility. I think it is OUTRAGEOUS that our General Assembly cannot find a way to make this happen out of our tax dollars, as opposed to borrowing the money! The care of these veterans should take precedence over so many of the items in our current budget! I urge you to contact your representatives and tell them that you want them to re-allocate money in the existing budget to cover this cost! This should NOT be left to a voter referendum!

patsfan

11:44 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Well said Rick!!! Vote YES on #4

Reply

b kcaj

12:30 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Rick-You have to realize Marina doesn't care about veterans. All she cares about are the teabagger causes, which include giving more tax breaks to billionares such as the Koch brothers, Donald Trump, and Sheldon Adelson, and helping the king teabagger Romney hide more of his billions while the veterans suffer.

VOTE YES ON #4!

Reply

marina peterson

12:44 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Hey b kcaj.... There are no stronger supporters of the veterans than teabaggers! And they have constantly supported the military and our veterans even when it wasn't "in vogue". That is why we are adamant that it should be a priority in our state's budget to build this home... not farmed off to some referendum where if it doesn't pass our legislators can say... "oh well, we tried". They can and should find the funds to do this NOW!

Reply

b kcaj

12:49 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Marina-Here's a novel idea for you-If you're so worried about borrowing a few bucks to build a new home for our disabled veterans, why don't you ask your buddy Romney to donate a small fraction of his billions he has hidden in offshore bank accounts?

It's obvious the only reason why you and your buddy Jack are against this project is because of the t-shirt that the veteran is wearing at the beginning of this story.

Reply

Rick Giannini

1:22 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Mrs. Peterson:

If we asked the legislature to reallocate the $95 million for this project, where would they pull the $ from? The 2013 RI state budget is $ 1.4 Billion Dollars. This project would take up about 1/2 of the State budget IF we followed your suggestion. What would you like to see cut?
RIPTA, Infrastructure repairs, perhaps higher education, public safety? Not to mention we would lose the Federal Funding that also is allocated for this project.

You claim to be educated, you are a very vocal person online, perhaps you should read this publication from the Secretary of State which fully outlines all 7 ballot initiatives this election:
http://sos.ri.gov/documents/elections/VoterHandbook_2012.pdf

Pay special to page 14 which fully outlines the interest rates.

The money allocated will also create jobs, from land clearing, to site work, architectural plans, construction and materials to landscaping, all of this will be infused into the economy, not to mention all of the employees hired to construct this will also be pumping money into the local shops for goods & services such as lunch, breaks etc.

Your ideology of taking money and reallocating it is akin to the "Rob Peter to pay Paul" scheme. Clearly taking money from the current budget isn't economically viable, had it been, I'm certain that our elected officials wouldn't have tried to reinvent the wheel on this matter.

Reply
Comment_arrow

marina peterson

1:44 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

My thought would be to make some cuts in money spent on illegal immigrants.

b kcaj

1:32 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

You have to keep in mind Rick, it wouldn't matter to Marina if building the new veterans home half the state budget, one percent of the state budget, or 50 cents-it's all about her teabagger philosophy. If the new veterans home ballot question passes it might mean some billionaire would have to pay an extra dollar or two in taxes next year, and we know how Marina and her fellow teabaggers love to protect the billionaires and destroy the middle class.

And don't forget, the job of building the new veterans home might be done by unionized laborers, which is a dirty term in Marina's vocabulary.

Reply

Fran Sousa

2:15 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012

Marina and her Eastbay Un-Patriots trying to defeat a bond referendum for our Veterans.

Reply

Fran Sousa

8:38 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Mariana typical of you totry and through something that has no revelance like illegal aliens at the bond referendum for our Veterans. Why do you tell us how muck is spent on illegal aliens and how much is spent on our Veterans

Reply

Fran Sousa

4:30 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

Never mind Marina I just saw your made up figures. By the way these figures were all proven wrong by the Providence Journal years ago. Stop taking aim at our Veterans to try and prove your unrealistic point

Reply

cernernut

8:48 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I am voting "NO" on all referenda; until the pols can show some responsibility in controlling waste and fraud-----not another penny!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Still Broke

10:06 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I agree. We just made all of these cuts last year to pensions etc. because we couldn't afford them and were going broke. Now that we seem to have a little breathing room, all of these new bond issues are coming up. We'll be right back where we started.

Leave a comment