DOT Cuts Off Tuesday Toll Hearing, Tells Residents To Submit Written Comment
The state Department of Transportation Director Michael P. Lewis cut off Tuesday's toll hearing in Tiverton just after midnight, directing residents who did not get to speak to submit written comments.
Director Michael P. Lewis of the state Department of Transportation (DOT) ended Tuesday's toll hearing just after midnight on Tuesday, cutting off commentary from several speakers.
The five-hour public hearing featured a steady line of residents, all but one who were in opposition to the placement of a toll on the Sakonnet River Bridge. The informational public hearing was conducted as part of the DOT's evaluation of the environmental impact a toll would have on the community, businesses and surrounding infrastructure and will be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by the end of January 2013.
"The meeting was advertised until 10 p.m. and the meeting the night before ended around 10:30 or 10:45 p.m.," said Charles St. Martin, an information and public relations specialist for the DOT. "Last night went longer."
Outspoken toll opponent and member of the Sakonnet Toll Opposition Platform (STOP) Robert Coulter, chided Lewis and the DOT for ending the meeting without allowing all speakers to be heard, as Tiverton-Little Compton Patch reported Lewis promised at the beginning of the meeting.
"Lewis, despite promising to stay as long as it took to me, Chee [Laureano, chairwoman of Tiverton STOP], [Tiverton Town Council President Edward] Roderick, and [Councilman Jay J.] Lambert in a meeting last week, and saying it again tonight as you reported, cut off comment at the microphone and packed up before I and others could speak," said Coulter last night after the hearing. "I am concerned because they packed up, there is no record of this and we need a record for the federal challenge."
Lewis was in meetings on Wednesday afternoon and not available for comment, a request for comment was submitted by Patch and is expected tomorrow.
According to St. Martin, the stenographer packed up the recording materials, but Lewis and other DOT personnel stayed to discuss residents' concerns.
The DOT will be accepting written commentary through the end of its evaluation period until materials are submitted to the FHWA.
Interested residents may download a comment form or fill out an electronic version for submission to the DOT. Comment can also be addressed without the form to RIDOT's Customer service at customerservice@dot.ri.gov or by mailing to the address below:
-
Rhode Island Department of Transportation
Attn: Office of Customer Service
2 Capitol Hill
Providence, RI 02903
The effect of toll costs on individuals was a focus of Tuesday's dialogue.
Ellen Tavares, a self-employed caregiver said she drives across the Sakonnet River Bridge a minimum of four times a day during the work week.
"At five days a week, 52 days a year, just to work at about $1 a trip it will cost me over $1,000 a year," said Tavares. "Why is is fair for our small area of Rhode Island to bare the cost and upkeep of all the bridges and roads in our state?"
School Committeewoman Deborah Pallasch said the DOT was rushing through its environmental impact analysis without any real concern for the unintended costs the tolls would cause.
"I am extremely frustrated that we did not have enough time to really study the impacts these tolls will have on the services we provide [to Tiverton schools]," said Pallasch.
Many complained it was unfair that Newport County would be singled out in supporting the maintenance costs for it's two major bridges - the arteries for one of Rhode Island's biggest tourist destinations.
"We live on toll island," said Portsmouth resident Randy Martin before the hearing, greeting the public at the door to Tiverton High School with a pair of witty anti-toll signs. "With the way we are going now, proposing more and more tolls, we are not going to live in Rhode Island anymore. We might as well change the name and call us 'Toll Island.'"
The DOT is not responsible for setting a toll rate on the Sakonnet River Bridge. If the toll is approved by the FHWA after its reevaluation of the environmental impact survey, ownership of the bridge will transfer to the state Turnpike and Bridge Authority (RITBA).
Transfer of the Sakonnet and Jamestown bridges will only be accepted by the RITBA if an adequate source of funding is secured - such as the tolls. No one from the RITBA was available to comment on Wednesday afternoon as to whether the public would be invited to participate in the setting a toll rate should the FHWA approve tolling on the Sakonnet River Bridge. According to the DOT, $38 million would need to be raised annually through tolls to support the RITBA's four bridges.
Portsmouth Business Association
11:15 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Replay of Monday toll meeting on Channel 18 NCTV today at noon. Please pass the word that folks have an opportunity to see the whole meeting.
Portsmouth Business Association
11:03 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
To all users of the Sakonnet River Bridge, and all those 37,000 people who took the time to sign our NO TOLL Petition; please pass this information to all your friends, relatives, neighbors, and fellow workers.
The various groups working to stop the proposed the toll are working behind the scenes closely with the East Bay state senators and representatives.
Senator Felag and Representative Edwards have introduced bills and are in the process of getting signatures. Almost all of the East Bay elected officials have signed the bills. We will not know who has not signed those bills until January 20th.
Once we do, we ask that if you know state senators or representatives on the mainland, is to ask them for their support for the bill repealing Article 20. We will get more information to you as soon as we can.
One key point for the elected folks on the mainland is that any toll is bad for the local economy and will have a spillover effect on the state economy and employment. We cannot afford to put up a toll in this state at all, anywhere. Secondly, money can be found within the $8.1 billion dollar state budget for bridge maintenance.
Portsmouth Business Association
11:03 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
With enough support, the bills will go to committee and then possibly to hearings. Once we have details on the hearings, we are planning on having busses available for folks to testify at the hearings on Capitol Hill. We will need two more performances like December 3rd and December 4th.
We encourage folks to continue to write letters to the editor. We encourage business owners to capture empirical data on how a toll will specifically affect your business. We ask that you bring this information to the hearings, once they are scheduled.
Finally, we can continue to ask Senator Whitehouse for his support. He sits on the Transportation Committee. His Chief of Staff in Washington, DC is Sam Goodstein. Sam’s number is 202-224-2921. Call them and tell him that the economic and social impact studies that are required for the Federal Environmental Impact Statement were horribly inadequate.
no regr allia b
11:18 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
So when people use their right of redress under the US constitution on the government DOT and the people asking for redress is a limited number. Hmmm do not remember reading that in the Constitution..
All the people have the right to speak at a public hearing. If it is more than time allows, obviously you have to schedule another hearing so all have the right to speak out against this whether they are for it or against it.
Only one reason for silencing people is a backdoor "done deal" Bring this to the General assembly to have put on the State ballot for a vote by the people. This issue needs to be approved by the taxpayers period in my opinion. That is and has always been the system set up by the founders.
Granted it may be passed due the whole State voting and out numbering the East Bay, but at least it will be determine by the taxpayers and not some government agency.
Bob Venice
8:49 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Wow, The DOT and BCWA should merge, then they could run the entire State of Rhode sland. No one can stop either branch now. This is plolitical crap. We elect the officials,and then they turn their back on us. Are we living in Russia in the 50's? I can in no way believe this is happening in Country that elects their officials.
no regr allia b
9:26 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Bob; always use to say s I am sure you did to people in our younger days ( are you nuts that will never happen here in the good old USA). Never thought I would live to see the day but it appears I will. Tyranny is upon the citizens of our Nation I have no doubt any more.