House to Vote on Sakonnet Bridge Toll Thursday
The state has also proposed placing a toll on the Mount Hope Bridge connecting Bristol and Portsmouth.
On Thursday, legislators will vote on the budget bill for fiscal year 2013, which includes a provision to toll travelers that cross the Sakonnet Bridge.
State Sen. Louis P. DiPalma (D-Dist. 12, Little Compton, Middletown, Newport, Tiverton) has said the toll will hurt local businesses and residents, which is why he is not in favor of the proposal. Dipalma said he is not optimistic about Thursday's outcome. East Bay representatives are a small percentage of the 75-member House. East Bay and Aquidneck Island residents have also voiced strong opposition.
The House will vote on the budget one article at a time, which will allow for debate and amendment to the individual components. The Senate will vote on the budget as a package.
“It’s a challenging situation,” said the senator.
If passed, the maintenance of Sakonnet River Bridge and Jamestown Bridge would be transferred from the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT) to the Rhode Island Bridge and Transportation Authority (RIBTA).
The RIBTA is a quasi-governmental agency that is currently responsible for the maintenance of the Newport Bridge as well as the Mount Hope Bridge. The RIBTA funds the operating expenses through tolls on the Newport Bridge.
They are the only bridges in the state that are not maintained by RIDOT.
“[The state] does not have sufficient financial resources to assure the future maintenance and operation of the Sakonnet River Bridge,” reads the bill.
DiPalma said the Mount Hope Bridge and Newport Bridge are in good condition, but the state has not maintained the old Sakonnet River Bridge. A new Sakonnet River Bridge is currently being built.
“If the bridge was maintained, we wouldn’t be having this conversation,” he said.
During last Thursday’s hearing at the House Finance Committee, Rep. Daniel Reilly spoke out against the provision and said it would impose an unfair tax on Aquidneck Island residents.
“This will have an adverse impact on residents who use the bridge on a regular basis, harm local businesses both in terms of transporting goods and hurting the island’s tourism based economy,” Reilly told the committee.
Middletown Town Council President Arthur Weber agreed the toll will have a negative impact on the community.
“It holds everyone hostage on the island with tolls required for the major entrance and egresses and will penalize all without an E-Z Pass,” said Weber.
DiPalma said it boils down to a matter of what is fair, and the proposal does not fix that issue.
The bill reads, “The current toll structure places undue burden on the residents, businesses, and visitors who must use the Newport Bridge to access work, schools, shopping, and other essential services.”
DiPalma said the only positive aspect of the proposal is that extra toll revenue would be appropriated to road work in other cities and towns in the East Bay. He said approximately 40 percent of the Sakonnet Bridge traffic is out-of-state travelers.
Reilly disagreed the appropriations would work out in the favor of Aquidneck Island residents.
“It is not fair for residents of Middletown and Portsmouth to pay tolls that could subsidize road work in towns as far away as Jamestown, Warren or Barrington,” said Reilly.
Once the bill is approved by the House of Representatives, it will be passed to the Senate.
RI Politics
1:07 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Not too late to call ALL the reps. Some have responded to me that the more they hear it from tiv and lc residents they may shoot it down.
DownTown
5:27 pm on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
It's nice how this dovetails with the State pulling back millions in $$ support for East Bay schools.
Extra toll revenue will go towards local roads? That's nice since the State doesn't spend squat on the area roads or anything else.
Shades of Gray
10:25 am on Friday, June 8, 2012
Bridge tolls are a bunch of balony! Why are bridges any different than maintaining roadways all over the state? We pay state taxes to maintain the roadways statewide, so why don't those taxes get applied to the bridges as well? It shouldn't matter if the road goes over a bridge or not. It's part of the state system.
John Coccio
7:14 am on Monday, June 11, 2012
Hey, I made my idea to avoid them (mileage tax) You all cried foul beacause "you don't drive in RI" Well, the people in Johnston, Smithfield, Warwick and Pawtucket that I work with say "Screw the east bay!!!! They can afford it!! Besides, why should I pay for a bridge I never use??"
Well, if everybody wants to be selfish and worry about themselves individually instead of the welfare of the entire state, then I hope you enjoy the tolls and they enjoy their fall off the 6-10 connector ramps.
Have fun this summer paying more and sitting in traffic!!!!! YOU asked for it!!!
Richard
3:40 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012
PIGS!! Remember when the Newport Bridge toll was supposed to last "only a little while" Then you up it to 4 bucks!! Well, that is for NY residents....so ok I agree with that. But, if someone works on the island but lives in MA, guess what, they quit. You should manage MY/OUR money better
Shades of Gray
4:58 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012
To those who say "why should I pay for a bridge I never use?" Because state taxes pay for roadways near you, that others don't use. I don't drive in your area, but I pay to maintain your roads with my taxes.
DownTown
7:20 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012
The easy answer is to move away.
This state is in such bad shape and all they do is raise the budget and raise taxes.
DownTown
7:23 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012
They are repaving Hope Street in Bristol this summer but I don't think it's been paved in over 20 years prior to this.
When was the last time East Main or West Main roads were paved?
Little if any State or Federal money is spent in the East Bay but they sure know where to find us when they collect taxes.