patching...
Breaking: Bristol Firefighters Help Knock Down Two-Alarm Fire »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Should Rhode Island Eliminate the Sales Tax?

Rep. Jan Malik of Warren and Barrington has filed a bill to end the 7-percent sales tax in Rhode Island.

 

 

Massachusetts is considering lowering its 6.25 percent sales tax to 4.5 percent. 

Should Rhode Island respond and eliminate sales tax to keep small businesses competitive?  Tell us what you think in the comments section.

At least one lawmaker says the answer to that question is 'yes.'  

Saying it is “about time we had a dialogue on this,” Rep. Jan P. Malik (D-Dist. 67, Barrington, Warren) has introduced legislation to eliminate the Rhode Island sales tax.

The bill, 2013-H 5365, calls for the end of the sales tax effective October 1 of this year. The bill provides that, as of that date, all regulations relating to the collection of sales tax and enforcement of collections will sunset and, further, that as of October 1, the local meals and beverage tax will also be eliminated.

“Our sales tax is killing small businesses, especially those in border communities,” said Malik, who is a member of the House Committee on Finance, to which the legislation has been referred. “I am one of the small business owners getting hammered because, at least in terms of sales tax, I cannot compete with my nearby Massachusetts competitors. I am down 20 percent in business over the past two years, and it doesn’t matter if we have low prices at my liquor store or not. People just don’t way to pay a sales tax when they can drive a few miles to Massachusetts where there is no sales tax on liquor.”

Malik added that Rhode Island stores would benefit from ending the sales tax.

“How can Rhode Island continue to compete at 7 percent? How can Rhode Island restaurants compete at 8 percent? They can’t," he said. "We need to find a way to fix this, and a serious discussion of our sales tax is a discussion we need to have, now, before more small stores close their doors.”

Malik acknowledged that elimination of the sales tax will mean a void in revenue coming into the state, but he believes that competitiveness – by way of lower prices due to no sales tax – will spur economic activity, resulting in more businesses opening and hiring.

“Any growth in economic activity in this state should be seen as a major plus, because business owners lives in the state and pay income and local taxes, and the people they employ live in the state and pay taxes, and the other companies that support these small businesses will also grow in volume,” he said.

Malik said his goal with proposing the bill "is just to get the dialogue started. I just want our state to do better and to level the playing field for those businesses out there that are really hurting because other states are stealing away their customers.”

The Malik bill is co-sponsored by House Minority Leader Rep. Brian C. Newberry (R-Dist. 48, North Smithfield, Burrillville), Rep. Joseph M. McNamara (D-Dist. 19, Warwick, Cranston), Rep. Samuel A. Azzinaro (D-Dist. 37, Westerly), Rep. Arthur J. Corvese (D-Dist. 55, North Providence) and 28 other Representatives.

Related Topics: Rep. Jan Malik, Rhode Island General Assembly, and Rhode Island State sales tax

Manifold Witness

12:14 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Can Representative Malik please show us some math on this?
To start the discussion.

The theory is that sales will go up enough to create enough jobs to add additional state income taxes to make up the $900,000,000 a year in tax revenue that the sales tax generates to the state.

Okay.

From the employer’s standpoint- How much more in sales will be generated?
And where is the break point for hiring even one more employee?
Is it somewhere above first earning back previously lost sales?
Any Obamacare implications for any RI businesses?

From the employee’s standpoint-
The newly hired pays taxes? It's not “under the table” or “on the side”, right? (This is a RI thing – it is said with innocence of eye and a straight face like it’s a real thing, and it’s handed down from generation to generation, and it benefits both the employer and the employee who in all other circumstances pretend that they know nothing about any such thing. And the (taxpaying) listener (puzzled) goes, “Oh…oh…right…yeah…of course….I forgot" as he slowly backs away thinking, gee, it's harder to "cheat" on sales taxes, right?).

(None of this is meant as a reflection on Hon. Rep. Malik. It's just a RI thing to consider.)

So seriously-
How much are the grossed-up sales that would be required to
generate enough jobs (and what are the grossed-up wages on those jobs?) to make up in NET other taxes (show the numbers, please) the loss of $900,000,000 in sales tax?

Reply

Leave a comment