The Rhode Island Voter Coalition will be holding a forum for the candidates for Warren Town Council on Oct. 18.
The forum will be held upstairs at Warren Town Hall, 514 Main St., Warren, at 6:30 p.m. The Rhode Island Voter Coalition is a non-partisan, open, fact-seeking civil engagement group designed for the sole purpose of getting people involved in their government through an individual examination of their representation. We are not a fundraising tool nor do we offer endorsement.
The event will allow the voters to directly pose questions to the candidates and educate them on the issues that are important to them. We not only believe that this will allow voters to choose the candidate that truly represents them, but also will hold some accountability to the promises given to the people by these representatives. This event is FREE and open to the public.
The following confirmed candidates are scheduled to participate:
DAVISON BOLSTER - I
JOSEPH A DEPASQUALE - I
DAVID S FRERICHS - D
SCOTT FRANCIS LIAL -I
CHRISTOPHER W STANLEY - R
CATHERINE A TATTRIE - D
BRIAN RICHARD MELLOR - D and RICHARD SILVA - D have not responded.
This is an opportunity for you the voter to meet face-to-face with the candidates and ask the questions that are important to you. Candidates will be given the opportunity to make a brief platform statement and then all of the questions will come from the audience.
The forum will be filmed and shown on Public Access Television.
We hope to see you there!
Information on Rhode Island Voter Coalition can be found at http://rhodeislandvotercoalition.org/

Gina
11:12 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
I was hoping to see Mellor & Silva as confirmed....Other than Mr. Mellor working at my awesome local food market...and a letter I saw posted from Mr. Silva some time ago that I totally disagreed with I really have no clue where they stand on the issues facing our town.
marina peterson
11:52 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
I did hear from Mr. Mellor yesterday and he will be out of town for the forum. He asked me to submit questions to him and he would answer them. I responded that I do not live in Warren and am not familiar with the issues there. I am only hosting the forum. I still have not heard from Mr. Silva.
Joe Burns
11:00 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Please make sure someone sets up the questions for Mr.Mellor. Even tho you are putting on the forum you should get a set of questions they will ask him so someone can read his answer.
Mr. Mellor is OVER qualified for the seat! He serves as the Vice Chairmen of the Warren Democratic Committee and a life long resident of Warren. A true Warrenight, will fight for the people of this town. He will help businesses prosper in these tough times. If you give a tax break for 1 business you have to give a tax break for all! Mr. Mellor will do this. Mr. Mellor is committed to this position.
Brian will help every single Warren Resident in the town. He will fight for the right issues! This year in 2012 it is TIME to see NEW faces and FRESH ideas! I hope that every single resident votes for Mr. Mellor. It is time for a new councilmen to get on the Warren Town Council! Brian R. Mellor SR. is the RIGHT CHOICE FOR WARREN!
marina peterson
12:03 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Joe, I appreciate your concern but there is no way to prepare a set of questions for Mr. Mellor in advance. All of the questions come from the audience verbally the night of the forum in a Town Hall style. They are not prepared in advance.
Since I do not live in Warren and have no idea what the town issues are I would not be able to give him any idea of what the voters will ask.
We just completed a forum for Bristol Town Council Candidates and it was very, very, successful! Many claimed it was the best forum they have ever been to. The format is open, fair to all, and non-partisan.
It would be in his best interest to be there.
Bob Venice
8:25 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Why bother at all to have this forum. The only people that will be taking questions are our current council and Joe, who served two years ago. To make the meeting mean anything we would need the two new members there. Maybe it should be rescheduled.
marina peterson
1:09 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Bob, It could easily have been rescheduled if the candidates had responded when they were invited on September 12th. They did not. I sent emails and made follow-up phone calls. No response. It is too late now to reschedule. I hope you can understand that it takes a lot of pulling things together to to have this event. There needs to be a venue, videographers have to be booked, press releases have to be sent out, etc. It doesn't come together overnight.
brian m
6:05 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Marina, do you recall that you called my cell and told you I didn;t recieved your origional email which you resent to me which I responded to and you thanked me for the response. I.ll not get into a debate on Patch, just be fair to everyone.
Joe Burns
11:40 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
It should be rescheduled! How rude is that? Whats the point of having it marina?In Bristol there are many town council canidates where in warren there are 3. Reschedule this forum! Either that or write down the questions being asked so Mr. Mellor can respond to them at a later date.Either that or I will go and record all questions and Mr.Mellor can and will respond back!
Other than that this forum will be a waste of peoples time!
Kelly
4:39 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Wow joe, you must be Mellor's campaign manager huh? Why should he be given special preference when he had the same opportunity as the others? I think it is very rude of you to deride a forum for canidates, just because your canidate saw fit to not respond in a timely mannor and the others did.
If he could not find the time since Sept 12 to respond he is the rude one. Give him the questions!! What makes him so special? No canidate even the Presidential debate canidates did not get the question before it. That would be pointless to have a forum like that. Perhaps Mellor hould look up the definition of public forum as well as you joe, before you start deriding the messenger. I am sure Marina put a lot of time and work into this as she does on all these endeavors.
He who does not speak out is not heard. So I guess Mellor does not want to be heard.
brian m
6:12 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Kelly please ask Marina if she called me and she did receive a response by email which I have a copy of I.m not rude but I don;t agree with everything that is said by Marina. You can read my reply's in the Warren Time's if interested and I"ll stay off patch unless real names are used. Thank You
Gina
7:40 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
Had the candidates responded by the September 12th date it could have been rescheduled !...They didn't...it took follow up emails & phone calls to get their response. Is it possible that they just don't want to do it ? That's what I am thinking. Mellor didn't respond until October 1st...and from what I can tell Mr. Silva hasn't even responded ?...The East Bay newspapers usually ask the candidates questions & post it in the paper...I have seen it for the Barrington town council & school committee members but not Warren. I refuse to vote for someone with name recognition only or by how many signs they have in peoples yard or businesses.
Joe Burns
9:13 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
let me just state that it was not my intention to sound rude. I am just saying this. All members at the forum have served on the town council. We know them. We know there issues. Joe has served on the council before. There is only 2 candidates that we don't know. Mr. Mellor was asked and he was told he couldn't be there.
marina peterson
12:41 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Joe, Who told Mr. Mellor that he couldn't be there? Let's get back to rescheduling.... please understand that it is impossible at this late date. We have forums scheduled all over the state and can only be in one place at a time. As I said before, if he had responded in a timely manner it might have been possible to change the date. However, I talked to him personally on September 12th at the BCWA meeting and he told me he did not like the idea of questions from the audience and would not attend.
Richard Silva
7:27 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Not all town council candidates will be at the October 18 forum. I will not be there because I was not invited. I never received an email or a telephone call regarding the candidate forum. I did get a call from the town clerks office asking me for my email address for someone looking to contact me. I gave it and never heard anything after that call. There are other candidates that did not receive an email but they got a follow-up telephone call. My thought is that I may have been overlooked because of the Patch letter I wrote last February, regarding the water authority. To the voters of Warren I can be contacted via email (silvar12@cox.net) and will be more than happy to answer any questions you may have. I am retired and have the time to fulfill the duties required of a councilperson. The difference with me is I will work for the entire town of Warren, not just the west side of the bike path. I am a former member of the Warren Zoning Board and a present member of the Planning Board. Everyone may not agree with my thoughts or decisions but they are made with the best interest of Warren in mind.
marina peterson
12:34 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Mr. Silva, I did sent you an invitation on September 13th, a reminder on September 18th, and another on September 24th. You are right in saying that I did not call you. You are the only candidate that I did not have a phone contact for. I certainly would have called you if I had your phone number. EVERYONE who is running for office is invited to our forums. It would have had nothing to do with a letter you may have written about the water authority. I think everyone that knows of these forums will attest that all are invited. You were certainly not overlooked. I don't live in Warren, and don't know you, but I did ask several Warren residents if they knew you and if you were going to attend. I am very surprised that you did not hear of the forum as it had press coverage and two of the women who work at the Town Hall have volunteered to help me with it.
Kelly
7:31 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Brian M
My concern is that your friend Joe (I am assuming that) would want questions given to you rather than from the voters. It is disconcerting also to here Marina state “September 12th at the BCWA meeting and he told me he did not like the idea of questions from the audience and would not attend”.
I find that upsetting in this day and age of politicians thinking they know better than the voters what’s good for them. It also shows that your friend Joe is doing you no favors it seems to me with statements he made above like you should somehow be treated differently than everyone else in my opinion. That is basically my point. Other than that I think this is silly to argue this as you are not going to be there anyway which makes you moot as far as this forum goes. Rules are rules.
Kelly
7:34 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
I also think the (Rhode Island Voter Coalition ) does a wonderful job on these local forums and has always been fair to everyone I have been at on occasion.
brian m
8:05 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
From: Bm649@aol.com
To: rivc1@cox.net
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Invitation - RIVC Candidate Forum Warren Town Council, October 18, 2012
Marina, I'll be out of town on the 18th, but will try my best to make the forum as I'll be coming back from Maine. If you would like a statement on why I'm running one would be forward before the 18th. If you have any questions feel free to email them. Thanks Brian
This is the email sent to Marina, where is the statement that I would not attend. End of this discussion, if everything goes ok I'll try to be there.
marina peterson
12:17 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Brian, We spoke on September 12th at the BCWA meeting (several others were there during the conversation) and you had said at that time that you did not like the idea of "not knowing what people would ask" and that you would not attend. I tried to talk you into attending and said that it would be no different than sitting on the council and being asked a question by a constituent. If you don't know the answer you simply say you will check it out and get back to them. If I recall, you were very concerned about "inappropriate questions" and I told you that I have done over 25 forums and never had an "inappropriate question. When we spoke on the phone you told me that you could not attend because you would be in Maine on the 18th.
Joe Burns
11:35 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Kelly I was unaware of the way this would be set up.
I never said this was a bad idea
I only said why have a forum for 5 members all 5 people who currently serve on the town Council.
I am not a campaign manager.
I am a friend who does support Mr. Mellor for town council.
Joe Burns
11:36 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012
Brian will help every single Warren Resident in the town. He will fight for the right issues! This year in 2012 it is TIME to see NEW faces and FRESH ideas! I hope that every single resident votes for Mr. Mellor. It is time for a new councilmen to get on the Warren Town Council! Brian R. Mellor SR. is the RIGHT CHOICE FOR WARREN!
marina peterson
1:21 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I would like to make something perfectly clear here. I do not live in Warren. I have no vested interest in who gets elected to Town Council in Warren. This is not even about the candidates! I do this because I feel it is important to engage the electorate and help them to feel that they are part of the electoral process. Other debates/forums have "canned questions". And who writes these questions? Other politicians? Media? Academia? The questions should come from the people who are going to be choosing a candidate! If you are a candidate it is probably in your best interest to participate and demonstrate to your future constituents that you care about their concerns!
Richard Silva
2:58 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
One quick note, I have lived in Warren for thirty five years (20 years previously in Bristol and in Warren before that) and my number is in the book. I am known quite well at the town hall and around town. I will not be attending when I can see I see I was left out. And by the way you called me approximately mid August and left me a message, I returned your call and you didn't know why you called me. You took my email address and said you had something to send me. I guess you miss placed the telephone number or just dropped the ball on this one as some of us do from time to time. Good luck with your forum.
marina peterson
11:48 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Thank you. I guess some things are just not meant to be. I am really surprised that the women in the Town Clerk's office did not let you know about this forum as they are helping me out with it. You are probably correct on the phone call in August. I was putting together quite a few forums and when you called me back I could have very well not registered the name. Especially since we have never met and I don't know who you are.
I can assure you, you were NOT left out. I send three emails to you. Maybe they got caught up in Spam as sometimes happens when emails contain a link.
Thank you for your good wishes. I'm sure it will go well.
Kim
4:07 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Marina, here's an idea. Be a true mediator, and say, due to miscommunication (mea culpa), the forum will be rescheduled and re-invite all the candidates personally, and on Patch. Those who do not show up for petty reasons are just that, petty. Those who can make the new date show up. This clears your name and theirs, because at this point, you say you have no stake and invited everyone for the greater good of Warren, and the candidates who posted here are calling your bluff, so it's hard for some of us to believe either side. Three sides to a story, right?? Start fresh or call it off. Otherwise, I'm more likely to side with them.
Kelly
4:47 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Here's a real idea, how about you contact the "Rhode Island Voter Coalition"? They have been around for a while and are the backers of this. You are putting thisall on Marina and that is wrong. Well she is the favorite punching bag of DEMs in the Easy Bay, it does not make it right. 3 sides? I think not.
These forums have been around for a while and this one advertised for quite some time. The 2 people in question should have had the smarts to know back on Sept. 12 that a political forum is something they should call about and ask if they can be part of it.
Bu no; they have to wait till they are invited and then comfirm at the last minute. Give me break! The only people responsible for this are the 2 individuals whinning. Mellor for his obvious lack of diligence and not liking public forums. Richard for not having a phone number to contact when he is running 2 months before an election. Granted these are my opinions but I am sick of people thinking voters need to bow down to canidates or politicians.
If they want the job. They are responsible to get the message out not the voters. That would be common sense. Jesus this is petty on thier part.
marina peterson
5:07 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I'm sorry it's a matter of sides, Kim. The reality is that I have no more dates that are free between here and election day. My schedule is full. Between being the state leader for TruetheVote (training pollwatchers, etc.), other RIVC forums, and Town Meetings and BCWA meetings which provide a conflict, there is not a day left. That is why I book the venue at least two months in advance.
Bulletin, I just received an email from Richard Silva saying that he DID receive the email and he is trying to make arrangements to attend. That, my friend, is the easiest solution of all. "I love it when a plan comes together"....
Kelly
8:13 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I was not trying to be disrespectful Kim. It just makes me sick when people who get involed in doing good things that will not benefit themselves as Marina does, and it is a long long list. People always seem to bring in tea party, gop, dem ect. None of that should have anything to do with it. There are more independents at the forum then anything and only one GOP.
You cannot just cancel these things once a reasonable time has been given for response as Marina stated. I believe in self responsibility from those canidates, not trying to blame the person who did what they could to contact them. I will say again that they are responsible to get the message out not the voters. This close to election day if they are not keeping an eye out for any venue to get themselves out there is unfathomable.
These happen every year now in some form or another "think townhall" meetings since 2008. Thats about all I have to say about it and why I give credit to Richard for admiting it was his error and hopefully there may be a way for him to be there.
I also do not think Marina cares what party they belong to. As she has stated many times in public; It is about getting the message out and let the chips fall where they may. My words ;-}.
no regr allia b
5:52 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Great Marina, I also love when someone does make a mistake they try to correct it. Good for you Richard.
Kim
7:50 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Sorry Kelly. I was speaking bipartisan, as a registered independent, that is. I don't know the candidates in question, or Marina. I was just suggesting that they were making her look bad, as if she dropped the ball, (not intentionally snubbed them) and her best option would be to reschedule, to keep her "good" name. But the apology is for the fact that I just realized what I stepped into by commenting. So I did my research. This is not really about 2 candidates that did not respond in time or lack of email. Apparently, it is about the fact that they were 2 democratic candidates and Marina is part of the East Bay Patriots (Tea Party), and there is, as you pointed out, some ongoing issue between Marina and the Democrats, so that's why the question of candidates not showing up and Marina supposedly not inviting them was such a big issue, although I don't believe she has a partisan agenda with these forums, but rather would like to see people informed about the candidates BEFORE they vote. But, sorry for thinking the "big to do" was actually a miscommunication issue. I guess there are really 3 sides.....And by the way, as far as the East Bay goes, Marina IS the RIVC.....
Richard Silva
8:49 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I have one thing to clear up and I am done with this. When I said I received her email that was the email she sent me today.
Marina, I truly felt I was left out because of my last letter about the town council and the BCWA. I've come to see you are working this alone and it must frustrating when things go awry. You do deserve accolades for pulling this together. As for the Tea Party, I could care less what affiliation you are.
marina peterson
11:07 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Thank you Richard. And, for the record, I do not belong to the Tea Party. As I said before, I don't know who you are and I am not from Warren. I received the list of names and emails from the Warren Town Hall and I invited everyone on the list. I am sorry that you did not receive the three previous emails but am glad that you realize that I certainly did not exclude you. I don't even know you! Suffice it to say we have beat this dead horse enough. Let's get back to the election!
Kim
7:43 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Sorry Marina for insinuating you are a member of The Tea Party, and I don't personally care if you are, but If you do not belong, then I suggest you have your name removed from their database because it gives the perception you do, especially when you go to the website- http://www.teapartypatriots.org/groups/east-bay-patriots/members/,( which is the site of "A Freedom Loving Tea Party Group Dedicated To Rhode Island’s East Bay") you are listed as a member and the website- http://eastbaypatriots.ning.com/profile/marinapeterson?xg_source=profiles_memberList, is a direct link to your member profile on the "East Bay Patriots of RI-An Independent Tea Party Group" website.
But thank you for hosting the forum. But honestly, it shouldn't be your job as an "out of towner" to schedule these things, moderate, yes, but schedule, no. If the candidates are confident in their abilities, and firm in their beliefs, this should be something they should be asking for, not waiting around until it comes to them. And what's sadder, is that some voters don't bother to find out, but they vote candidates in, despite not knowing their stance on issues, because they are already in office (so they must be doing the job), they see a name on a sign, the candidate is a friend of a friend, or because someone took the time to knock on their door and smile. It's time the facts come out, but will the voters be there??
marina peterson
11:27 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
I apologize Kim for the confusion. Yes, I am an organizer for East Bay Patriots but there is some back history here that people should know. East Bay Patriots came about because of the RI Tea Party (of which I was the co-founder) deciding to allign themselves totally with the Republican Party. This was NOT the original purpose. These Tea Party groups were started to inform the public on subjects that may not have been covered by the local press, and to support Free Markets and the Constitution. They were meant to be a network of members sharing information and rallying for specific issues. Unfortunately, here in RI, it didn't work out that way. The Patriots, nationally, are considered at "tea party-type" group. Here is RI, we shy away from being labeled Tea Party due to the partisan nature of the groups here.
Rhode Island Voter Coalition was formed for similar reasons. The forums or debates that did exist CHOSE the questions that would be asked of the candidates instead of listening to the people. Hope this helps.
On your second point, I would love to train YOU to take over the forums in Warren on behalf of RIVC. Would you be interested? Normally it is not as contentious as this and comes together quite smoothly. I don't think I will do another in Warren due to the amount of time that has been taken up on this one working out the various objections. What do you think?
Richard Silva
11:59 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
I know your comment was not directed to me but i want to thank you for the explanation between the Tea Party and the Patriots. I alway thought they were the same.
marina peterson
12:27 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
You're welcome. No, they are not the same. We are absolutely non-partisan and do not endorse candidates. Our goal is to provide information on issues that don't seem to surface here in RI.
I do these RIVC forums because I truly believe that the voters should have an opportunity to ask the candidates the questions that are important to them. It's about the voters... not the candidates. I have yet to have a forum (and I have done approx. 25 all over the state) where the candidates are not extremely pleased with the results and the relationship that the forum allowed them to build with their future constituents. If you know anyone in Bristol who went to the forum last week, ask them what they thought.
marina peterson
5:27 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
I must apologize for my audible gasp last night at the Candidate forum in Warren. Mr. Stanley was asked a question... regarding BCWA and what has transpired, does he regret saying that the critics were on a witch hunt. Mr. Stanley replied that he did NOT regret it and that 's exactly what it was... a witch hunt to destroy one man. As one of the "East Bay Four", I was astounded by that response. What about the fact that the East Providence was NOT complete and ready to go? What about the fact that there had been NO flushing of the pipes for the last six years as a budget cut?. resulting in tuberculated pipes and poor water pressure? What about the fact that there was no strategic plan, or no procedural manuals? I could go on and on... not enough room. I was shocked and disappointed with that response and reacted automatically, forgetting my position at the forum.
Joe Burns
7:52 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012
Glad you apologized for that. Also you started that the two candidates who were not there opted out of not coming. Most moderators would have stated "Unfortunately the other two candidates were UN able to make itdue to prior commitments but both wished to be here"
marina peterson
1:54 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
I couldn't say that because I don't know for a fact that they both wished to be there. They did not confirm that to me. Mr. Mellor told me directly, in person, that he did not like the questions coming from the audience. Mr. Silva never responded to any of my communications until it became an issue on the blogs.
brian m
4:18 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Marina, do you ever post the truth? When you asked me about the forum you stated that questions would be written down with no name of who submitted the question and the question would be asked of only one canidate. I stated to you that the name of the person submitting the question should be included. You stated no one would know who submitted the question. People that were with you and I stated that the public should know who submitted the question and you disagreed. You have your own agenda about twisting the facts to suit you.
brian m
4:24 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Also Marina you called me about the forum and you were told on that date I would be out of town but would try my best to attend. You stated that I never responded. I have email to prove otherwise. Is this because I told you I don't support some of your people, Now you want to be paid by BCWA for volunteer work.
brian m
4:27 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
This will be my last post on patch. Marina BCWA will pay you because you have some board members who belong to the tea party-east bay patriots.
Mike M
12:00 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Wow, this was all quite a read! Marina, I think its kind of funny that you had an audible gasp at the forum. The whole BCWA thing was not a witch hunt, seriously Stanley? It was a whole bunch of issues in which the BCWA was not running efficiently, and it was managed poorly. Employees using BCWA vehicles to go home for lunch, at least the worker in my neighborhood would. In the top 3 highest rates for water besides block island and Narraganset I believe. Why should we pay so much? Seems a bit, controversial doesn't it?
Regarding all of the comments above, I honestly am not sure Mellor is mature enough for this job. He began by defending himself and seemed like a possibly good candidate, but then it just got kind of pathetic. Especially with his campaign manager championing his guy! If you could not attend, then fine, but it sounds like there was a lack of communication. Your typing above is sloppy, and practically incoherent, which is disappointing, as I'd expect an elected official to be Professional.
I think Silva responded better, but I found it immature to keep saying, I was purposely excluded, and will not attend because of being ostracized. Come on, if you really wanted to fight for yourself, and have people hear your views, you would have gone. To not go because you felt uninvited, even though you were, is immature and unprofessional.
Both of these candidates have lost credibility, at least in my eyes, simply from this forum! Be professional!!!!!!
brian m
4:37 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Mike M I don,t have any campaign manager and Marina and I don.t see eye to eye. The truth was not posted by Marina and I answered all question from the Warren Times newspaper. I don't believe that Mr. Silva and myself were treated fairly because Mr Silva posted a comment on Patch about Marina and I told her some of the people she supported were useless.
Mike M
12:06 am on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Lastly, its ironic that Mellor has stated he dislikes having people answer him questions on the fly, as he likely will stammer when trying to answer, and will say something dumb. Then is appearantly in Maine and can't come back early to participate. If your going to run for office, you should make every attempt to be present at events such as this, to give confidence to the voters, instead, you and Silva were not present, and will simply be forgotten. Joe gets a lot of smack, but at least he is there, and I do see the guy move stuff off the road, which to his credit, is much appreciated!
I honestly like most of the Incumbents, except Tatrie and Stanley. Stanley is upsetting to me because of what I learned about his comments on the BCWA situation. If you have a view like that on such a massive issue in WARREN, then how on earth are you going to help the town?
Are we going to get some councilors who will actually help the town? Why was the American Tourister given such a hard time to turn it into condo's and add two stories? That would have looked amazing, add a boardwalk like Fall River along the water, and that area would be beautiful and nearing completion. Instead its still a half empty old mill, slowly falling into disrepair. I will Vote for the people I believe will give some NEW DEVELOPMENT a chance!
Good luck to everyone, and we will see what happens November 6th!
John Tattrie
9:05 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Mike M, I am confused about your statement, you say you don't like Cathie Tattrie then go on to complain about the empty mill, you must have had to much cool aid when you were writing your blog. She was an avid support of the mill being developed, perhaps you had your head in the sand when that was going on....you had better check your research on how your favorite candidates supported certain issues.
Mike M
11:21 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012
Ironically, you John are the reason I will not be voting for her, it has nothing to do with her opinion on the mill, so don't tell me I am drinking cool aid, its my opinion, and I will use my votes how I want.
John Tattrie
6:52 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
I see you are using a lot of logic in this election...good job! That's intelligent!
Mike M
11:39 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
Oh sorry John for disliking you because you attacked me several months ago, because I talked about something I witnessed with a special hazards truck, and you criticized what I saw and turned it into me being against the fire department, which couldn't be anywhere close to being true. I respect what those guys do, and know quite a few of them myself. Some times people make mistakes, but if its seen, it may get exposed. Sorry for reporting what I witnessed, how dare I !
John Tattrie
6:31 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Mike M, While I have nothing against you personally...you tend to set yourself up for this kind of stuff. The incident with the Special Hazards was a bit over the top and almost got innocent members looked upon in a poor manner because of what you posted. It is most certainly your choice to vote for anyone you like & in fact comment on them. My point was that you stated you wished the Mill wasn't sitting there empty. The people you choose not to vote for are the one's whom supported the re-use of the Mill, the others did not (Fact).The intent of my comment was to try and wake you up as to what you post...so that you stop contradicting yourself. The election is the election, I am not here trying to change your mind in anyway...but you can bet that at anytime I see something that contradicts what my wife does to try and help Warren, Your gonna hear from me, like it or not...this thing works both ways.I also am very careful as to what I comment on and pay very close attention to what the facts are. Also, I & my wife differ on many different topics, if you choose not to vote for her that's fine, But I can assure you I have very little if any input on her
decisions. Sorry you feel that I am the anti-christ and that I'm picking on you, but you can rest assured that I will always comment on a blog against my wife that would seem to have no reasoning behind it.
Mike M
9:31 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Interesting John, well I'll keep that in mind. What I said about special Hazards was the truth, its what I saw, sorry they didn't perform flawlessly, and I hear your in charge of Special Hazards, so perhaps your biased. And you should probably not use those flashing lights on your black pick up truck, those are illegal. Just because your on the Fire Department, does not mean you can throw on your flashing lights and pass people, or expect them to pull over for you. I saw someone in a Silver Impala blow a red light on main street behind Engine 5, is that legal? A minute later a black Ranger did the same, did not even stop. The RI LAW says the ONLY VEHICLES aloud to run a red light without stopping is the Post Office Vehicles. I am not complaining about the fire fighters, I appreciate everything they do, but they should not be breaking laws, it endangers themselves and other innocent motorists.
marina peterson
2:26 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Article in Warren Times-Gazzette re Warren council prez Stanley won’t back down on BCWA ‘witch hunt’ statement . Here is the link:
www.eastbayri.com/news/warren-council-prez-stanley-wont-back-down-on-bcwa-witch-hunt-statement/#comment-384
Voters need to comment on how they feel on this issue. It is election time and you need to decide who represents you and your town.
Joe Burns
7:02 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Let me state this. I am not affiliated with Mr. Mellor in ANY WAY! Not his campaign manager. I was unaware of the situation because the way I was told how it would be would be submitted questions. I had no idea it was just straight forward as that. It has been stated before.
As far as Mr. Stanley calling it a witch hunt is absolutely correct! I agree with him 100%. They are the East Bay 4 looking to start trouble and get people in trouble. They don't care they cause aggravation to them it is a pleasure. They think they are the Fantastic Four but in Reality they are just like Aqua Man. The Justice League's last option of hope.... Marina in my mind acted rude as the moderator. Thank's for putting it on it went awesome but councilors and residents and Candidates did not understand the RIVC rules. When Joey D asked if he could follow up on the question that was ORIGINALLY ASKED FOR HIM she replied with a rude NO and got some chuckles from the crowd.
But once again it is my opinion and CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM!
marina peterson
9:17 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Joe, I don't know why you had been told it would be submitted questions. All of our press releases state that the questions come from the audience and are posed directly to the candidates. All of the candidates were sent copies of the rules in advance. The rules were read aloud before the start of the forum.
Clarification, I will double check as soon as the video is ready, but I am quite sure that the question on EBEC was asked of all of the candidates. Joey immediately looked at me and asked if he could go first. I simply smiled and said, "Go right ahead". After all of the other candidates had given their views, he asked if he could go again. I smiled and said "no, you already had your turn". I would be very surprised if Joey himself thought it was rude. It is impossible to run any kind of candidate forum without rules. It just doesn't work.
Richard Silva
8:42 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Am I elated that I save emails. Marina, the creditbility of you and your organization are going down the tubes. You did not send me an email invitation to the forum as you did the other candidates. You wrote on Patch that I did not respond. I soon responded and told you that I did not receive an invitation. On October 9, after you and several of your friends belittled me in this blog, as you all they have in the past, you decided to send me the invitation. In less than a half hour I replied to your email and I quote
“At this point I have another commitment that I am trying to change. If I am able to change it I will let you know. Thank You”
Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. I promise you I will never participate in any type of forum you have anything to do with and if this organization is ligitimate they should distance themselves from you. So for all you people that think Marina is the best thing that's happened to this town think twice. If you would like to have a copy of the October 9 email, send me your email address and you can see for yourself.
marina peterson
9:23 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
Richard, I sent you all the copies of the email communications that were sent to you. I don't know what your email situation is and I suggested to you that sometimes when a link to a website was included messages get caught up in SPAM. You seemed to be under the impression at the time that I deliberately left you out.... and I don't even know who you are! Why would I leave you out? I went to the Warren Town Hall. I asked for the contact information of the candidates that were running. I then sent out the invitations. If I had your phone number I would have followed up with a phone call, but I did not have it. We have been through this before.
I understand that you are probably disappointed that you couldn't change your other commitment and attend... but it was YOUR choice. If you felt it was important, I am sure you would have attended. I even brought a bottle of water for you :-)
Manifold Witness
9:47 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012
“Joe Burns” (clever) confirms that it is commonly understood that Warren Town Council President Christopher Stanley was speaking of the East Bay Four when Mr. Stanley gave publication to his defamatory statements. Can’t hide behind “opinion” or “constructive criticism” on this. And it’s on the record.
Richard Silva (oh, the drama) admits Marina sent him an invitation. Apparently it wasn’t properly engraved nor hand delivered to His Highness (who is this guy?) on just the right silver platter.
Marina posted about this forum since last July. Mr. Silva could have “penciled it in” if he really wanted to be there so badly. Maybe he tripped over his ego & dropped his pencil.
In a July article, Marina commented about a candidates’ forum:
http://bristol-warren.patch.com/blog_posts/candidates-for-warren-town-council-who-do-you-like
Richard Silva posted a comment to it on July 18. Methinks Mr. Silva doth protest too much about tangled webs and all that jazz.
If Marina’s work is not good enough for Richard Silva, he can put on a play in the barn all by himself.
Marina – thanks for all you do! You won’t have to worry about catering to 1 prima donna who promised to never again grace your stage with his infamous (who is this guy?) self.
BrianM-too funny. More drama. His “last post on Patch” comes 10 minutes prior to his next post on Patch.
Warren politics. What’s the old saying? There must be somethin’ in the water.
marina peterson
1:37 am on Sunday, October 21, 2012
Brian, You are mistaken. I NEVER said that no one would know who asked the question! I explained to you that the person would be standing at a microphone looking the candidate right in the eye when they asked the question. That was the whole purpose of this format. To get the voters engaged in the electoral process and invite them to communicate directly with their candidates. All of the last 43 forums have been like that since we started in 2009. You told me that you were nervous that someone would ask an inappropriate question and I responded that I had never had that happen in four years, and didn't think it would be likely since they would be standing right in front of you. I think you must have this mixed up with another forum. I know that the League of Women voters takes written questions from folks. Maybe that's what is confusing you.
Gary Morse
5:20 am on Sunday, October 21, 2012
Mr Stanley's comments about BCWA public outcry being a witch hunt ignores the facts.
Fact: Under a new Board and new Executive Director, the Kickemuit raw water supply has been shut down as of June 2012.
Fact: The Kickemuit raw water supply was being polluted from 41 storm water culverts that channeled farm runoff directly into the Kickemuit. You can drive down Serpentine Road and see some of these DOT installed storm water "under the road" culverts yourself.
Fact: The Kickemuit had up-steam septic system overflow problems from the Smoke Rise Housing development
http://envstudies.brown.edu/oldsite/Web/special%20reports/Classes/Es192/2002/WebReports/Kickemuit_final.pdf
Fact: BCWA had stopped their pipeline flushing program due to the costs.
Fact: In 1993, a water borne illness resulted in many deaths from a Milwaukee cryptosporidium outbreak in their water purification system similar to the BCWA environment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Milwaukee_Cryptosporidiosis_outbreak
Fact: Warren residents bore the brunt of the highest concentration of Kickemuit processed water.
Fact: BCWA itself knew that the cost to process the polluted water from the Kickemuit was higher than simply purchasing water from the Scituate Reservoir
It's hard to imagine anyone actually endorsing this as good public policy for the residents of Warren. This was the main reason for the public outcry. It was not a "witch hunt"
Gina
7:22 am on Sunday, October 21, 2012
Marina, when is this being shown on Public Access ? and I was wondering if you knew where the other two candidates who did not attend stood on the EBEC ?
marina peterson
12:44 pm on Sunday, October 21, 2012
Gina... I will probably have the dates and times by Tuesday. We are finishing up the disc and will be delivering it to Full Channel and Cox tomorrow. That is when they will tell us the airing times. I will post them here, send emails to everyone, and Ted Hayes has promised to put them in the paper.
No, I do not know where the other candidates stand on EBEC. I believe that they read this blog so maybe they will log on and give their stand.
marina peterson
3:48 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
There is an article covering the Warren Town Hall Candidate Forum online at
http://www.eastbayri.com/news/warren-council-candidates-make-their-pitch/
Gina
7:24 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
Great article in the East Bay Newspaper Marina...too bad I still don't know anything about the other two candidates other than the comments I see here on Patch...which unfortunately hasn't given me the best impression....I would love to see where they stand on the issues addressed at the forum.
Mike M
11:37 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
Gina, I totally agree, and said it in reply to one of your posts in another topic. All i know about Richard and Brian is their immature attacks against Marina. They both had the opportunity to go to a forum, and because they could not, they blamed it on her. They were both invited, and even if they only knew a week ahead of time, your running for office, make time to get a chance to speak your views with your opponents. I think they were both to scared about messing up their answered, and avoided it.
Regarding all of this Patriots and Tea Party stuff, who cares? Why are we discriminating against patch writers for their political affiliation. Last time I checked, most news networks are all biased, and here on the patch, the articles don't really seem that biased at all, so who cares if she likes to tea party. If she was a democrat, would it really matter? Or independent? Judge people for who they are, not their political party choice. She has probably done a ton of work to arrange all of these forums and everything, so I don't think shes a bad person at all. So lets stop all of the slander and grow up... You both have completely lost any credibility. I can't even imagine what you two would do with everything your against, I don't see any possibility of compromising. IF you two act like this on the internet, the damage you'd likely do to this small little town would be substantial.
Richard Silva
7:47 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
As I understand it the East Bay Patriots is a group under the Tea Party that represents the east bay area of Rhode Island. Several of the same names I see on Patch, spreading their words of wisdom, are huge blog and forum contributors/members to the Tea Party, East Bay Patriots and the RI Voter Coalition. Does everyone see the connection here? The link below is for the East Bay Patriots web site forum. Read the second entry where a member from Rhode Island suggests hiring a prostitute to bring down a senator from Montana. Is this the group we should listen to that will take us to honest government. If the link is down before you get to read this let me know I have a screen print and willing to send it to you.
http://eastbaypatriots.ning.com/forum/topics/i-need-help-from-someone
marina peterson
11:56 pm on Monday, October 22, 2012
The East Bay Patriots is a non-partisan alternative to the Tea Party here in RI. .And if you read the entire blog you will see that the suggestion about the prostitute was in jest.
I realize that upholding the Constitution, supporting free market enterprise, and transparency is not for everyone.
no regr allia b
4:40 am on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Wow considering that the prostitute joke was from a comment about 2 years and 10 months ago (Feb. 5, 2010) and in the commenters next post he said it was levity, you sure have no credibility with that one richard! Screen print; really? Did you do selective editing to fit your narative which is totally false. You should go work for Axlerod lol. Oh thats levity.
I find it very petty and sad that you and mellor continue to blame the messenger over this forum that has now passed. Could it be that the Mellor/Silva tag team are so vicious on Marina for her work to get ratpayers of the BCWA a fair shake and clean a house that has been a cash cow for decades at the expense of ratepayers and taxpayers? I think yes. Of course thats only an opinion.
Kudo's to all you do Marina, no good deed goes unpunished as they say ;-}.
Manifold Witness
8:16 am on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
What will you do if you are elected, Mr. Silva?
Gina
9:26 am on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
For me...it's important to see the candidates reach out to all parties and iffiliations. Whether it's Democrat or Republican, Cool Moose or Moderate, or even Tea Party. You will be representing all the people. Not just who you like or don't like. If I told you Mr. Silva or Mr. Mellor that I was a member of the East Bay Patriots or Tea Party do they not care about my vote ? If I were to open a business in town or already had one would I be looked at differently by you when the council has to vote on something for my business ? From what I can gather from the comments made here it absolutely seems that way. I certainly hope I am mistaken. Correct me if I am wrong...
marina peterson
11:52 am on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
You are absolutely correct Gina. You will notice that in our forums, we only announce the names of the candidates and do NOT announce their party affiliation. Our hope is that people will start looking beyond party lines and elect someone to an office that they feel will adequately represent them and their views.
no regr allia b
12:04 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
It would appear you have hit the proverbial "nail on the head" Gina.
Richard Silva
1:58 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Gina, I care about everyone's vote. As a candidate I cannot please everyone but all my thoughts and ideas can be debated and possibly change my view. What has brought all this negativity from me is when someone has a different opinion, members of some of these organization belittle you instead of having a constructive dialog. Take for instance when I submitted my thoughts on BCWA. Sure maybe I could have
worded it differently but people here were relentless and compared me to Hitler. I sent my views on some issues to the Warren Times yesterday but they do not accept letters to the editor from candidates. I am waiting to hear from them if there something they can do for me in this week's paper. If not I will post it here.
marina peterson
2:09 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Richard, I think the issue with your comments on the BCWA was that you submitted your comments as an officer of the Democrat party. I think that was the issue that your fellow Democrats took issue with. I am certainly a great proponent of people sharing their views, whether it be online or in a letter to the editor. And I give you kudos for using your own name! Many are afraid to stand behind what they say.
Posting your views here is a great idea!
Gina
2:11 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
I look forward to hearing your views Mr. Silva. To me...it really doesn't matter who is asking the questions...all I care about is the answer.
Richard Silva
6:09 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
I was not able to participate in the recent candidate forum which was held on October 18 due to a prior commitment. As a result, my absence did not give the people of Warren the opportunity to hear my position on the issues and more importantly I did not get to hear your concerns. I am disabled so my door to door walks have been limited. My involvement in politics has always been as a worker for the candidates and never for myself. After serving on the Warren Zoning Board and presently the Planning Board I felt it was time to serve the town in a different manner and chose the Town Council. I am a former operations manager in the financial business and a Six Sigma black belt (a methodology for improving quality by reducing process defects).
My position/ideas:
Do a lean assessment on all town departments to determine if they are working in the most efficient manner, not necessarily to eliminate staff but to determine if processes are duplicated among departments. Does a process belong where it is?
As for the EBEC, I am in favor of the wind energy concept but not at a cost to the taxpayer. Private alternatives are available and should be investigated.
The comprehensive plan is a good document to have as direction but some sections in the draft needs to be debated.
Con't
Richard Silva
6:09 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Con't
As for the American Tourister building, we lost a great opportunity to have it developed when Meredith Management withdrew. Owners of large manufacturing buildings, that would like to subdivide to allow smaller business to lease space need quick approval. Potential occupants cannot and will not wait several months for town approval. During that time, they are exploring options in other towns/cities.
New business must be brought into town and with ease obtaining the necessary approval permits and licenses. Currently, required approvals are spread out among more than one department. This is where the lean assessment would determine if these could be brought under department.
We need to revise the zoning ordinances so that they reflect a business friendly attitude.
Appointments: Warren does not have documented qualifications that is needed for each appointed position. How can we appoint on qualifications only if we do not know what they are.. We also need to look at experience in personal life, as a member or previous member of a board and/or time spent as an alternate member.
These are a few of the issues that concern me and I invite you to send me any questions or concerns to my email address silvar12@cox.net.
marina peterson
12:02 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012
Nice job getting your platform out there! Wish more candidates had the courage to post their views online.
marina peterson
11:07 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012
Brian, I did some research and want to clear the record on our communications. I e-mailed you the first invitation on 9/13. Follow-up email on 9/24. On October 1st I was preparing the blog post for the Patch, and because I had your phone number I called you to to tell you I was submitting the post and wanted to know if you were coming to the forum. When we spoke you told me you did not receive the email, but you did not confirm at that time. I sent the blog in to the Patch the morning of 10/1. It was published on 10/2. (There is a time delay on initial blog posts.) I heard from you by email at 5:50 on the 1st, saying that you would be out of town on the 18th. You stated you would try your best to be there, but did not confirm. I would like you to understand that I called you BEFORE I submitted the post to make sure that you had the opportunity to confirm. We deal with a great many forums and have a procedure. Initial email, follow-up email, follow-up phone call if we have the phone number. With 39 towns, that is the best that we can do.
marina peterson
3:19 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012
Correction. It was 9/26 that I submitted the post that appeared on 10/2.
Gina
11:18 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012
Thank you Richard !
From the article I read in the times regarding Blount wanting to expand in Warren it looks like they were already exploring other options..in Bristol. Sure hope the process doesn't scare them away as well...
marina peterson
11:35 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012
The forum for the Warren Candidates for Town Council is now online at
https://vimeo.com/52151283
Full Channel and Cox times will be posted later today.
marina peterson
6:50 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012
Full Channel will broadcast Warren Forum at 3:00pm Friday, October 26th and 8:00am Thursday, November 1st.
Still waiting to hear from Cox Cable.
Also available on line at https://vimeo.com/52151283
jonnieh
11:04 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Where's Marina. She seems to be missing. Come on Marina no words of wisdom?
marina peterson
12:20 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012
Congratulations to the five newly elected Town Council members in Warren!! You ran good races and I wish you the best!! I was surprised to see Brendan Doherty pull over 44% of the vote in Warren! Good job Warren!!